Tanni Grey-Thompson: Paragon of the Paralympics

Tanni Grey-Thompson, warned a week ago, without mentioning the four-letter A-word, that disability benefit cuts would undermine the loudly proclaimed legacy of the Games.

Can Dame Tanni Grey-Thompson, be a champion of an ATOS Paralympics

 and speak for ordinary disabled hit by ATOS assessments?  

Not nearly half as much as it will undermine the health and independence of disabled people who lose benefit, Tanni!

Come on Tanni Grey-Thompson live up to your reputation as "...articulate  spokesperson for the rights of disabled people."  Lend your voice to those objecting to this disgraceful company, ATOS. The Paralympics will last a couple of weeks. ATOS assessments cause years of misery. 

Which National Newspaper is most at Fault for causing Rising Hatred toward Disabled People and Benefits Claimants?

The Social Welfare Union site is running this Poll: Which National Newspaper is most at Fault for causing Rising Hatred toward Disabled People and Benefits Claimants? These results below were current at my time of posting.

Daily Mail - 47.83%

The Sun - 41.3%

Telegraph - 6.52%

Daily Express - 2.17%

Other - 2.17%

As I suspected, the Hate and the Sun are fairly close in their bid to rid the world of disabled people and benefits' claimants. What a pity they don't use their massive resources of money and bile to track down the real cheats among us, namely the wealthy million and billion-aires who rob the country of scores of billions of £££s every year.

Surely stories of how the rich and powerful spend their time and ill-gotten wealth would make for far more salacious reading than the 'single mother in receipt of housing benefit while living alone with her child and no husband' world exclusive regurgitated, ad nauseam . Wouldn't it be great to see pictures of tax guzzler Philip Green's wife luxuriating in Monaco at our cost.

Or journalists rediscovering the investigatory talents they've so cleverly covered up over the past few years. Wouldn't they feel the better for stretching their journalistic skills. You know, reporting the news; not taking press releases from the DWP and submitting them as copy.

A Response to Breakthrough-UK's Stance on Remploy Factories

Last week Breakthrough-UK (B-UK) publicly released an email explaining why they would not put their name to a letter (this appeared in the Guardian on Friday 11^th May) posted by Inclusion London, and others, calling to keep Remploy factories open.

http://www.breakthrough-uk.co.uk/OurWork/policy/remploy

B-UK, while not wishing disabled workers to lose their jobs, nonetheless proceeded to explain why, for the greater good of the disability movement, Remploy workers should willingly surrender to their fate, thus consigning themselves and 'segregated' employment to the footnotes of social history.

Unless you happen to be a blue-collar factory worker...

B-UK contend: "Firstly, the social context has changed: the focus now for disabled people – for which we have fought long and hard – is on rights and independence, on mainstream employment and inclusive education, on user-led organisations and organisations controlled by disabled people. We have rejected segregated provision."

The above statement contradictory. On the one hand it calls for the mainstreaming of disabled people into employment, while at the same time promoting user-led organisations controlled by disabled people.

Which is it? Disabled people should either enter mainstream employment and be given a fair chance to compete on level terms (this could by using means such as Access to Work and reasonable adjustments); or, we should form user-led organisations which we control and run.

The idea of disabled people running a company from top to bottom is great. But, wouldn't this create a more complete disability 'ghetto' (I use this word in honour of Margaret Hodge who first, charmingly, used this term to describe Remploy factories) than Remploy. For now you'd not only have disabled workers, but the managers would also be disabled!

Incidentally, the use of 'segregated' when discussing Remploy's supported employment model is both provocative and misplaced. Most people who work are, to a greater or lesser degree, segregated. The very nature of most work means the individual has sold their skills/labour to an employer for a given period of time. During periods of work it is generally accepted that this is not one's own time. The nature of work, which for a great many workers takes us away from friends, family, and the general public, can crudely be defined as segregation.

Remploy factories do not differ in this sense. Indeed, they replicate workplaces up and down the country in both the private and public sector. Remploy workers clock-in from 7.30 am to 9 am, depending on the factory and nature of their work. They can be sacked; and they can invoke grievance procedures against their employer. They work, mostly, around a 35-hour week; have progressive holiday and sickness entitlement schemes; and good health and safety conditions. None of this was gifted to them. No, they were union organised and fought hard for these Ts and Cs, just as thousands of other workplaces have fought over the years.

B-UK continue their thesis, thus: "Secondly, the general economic context is vastly different to that of the immediate post-war years; the strong manufacturing base that we had, and which supported the Remploy model, is no longer: it has been replaced by the service sector and the economy is also rapidly developing into an IT and communications base. Remploy planning and development has not really taken account of these changes."

There is grain of truth in B-UK's reasoning here. However, manufacturing still accounts for 12% GDP (whereas financial services only account for 9%) employing around 2.2 million workers.

But, you're right Remploy should have kept up with the markets and began diversifying 15-20 years ago. They should have looked to other industries to tap into. Indeed, some factories did invest in some areas of modern industry such as telesales and security monitoring.

But we, in the trade union movement, have been complaining to successive governments that depending on old trades and businesses was not the way forward for Remploy. Back in 2007 we even put forward an alternative business plan to Price Waterhouse Cooper (who were carrying out a Review of Remploy) that would have better exploited reserved contracts for supported factories and businesses. Our plan would have brought down the government subsidy per head in the factories massively; but, we needed time to make good decades of decay. One union officer felt that given the right kind of work and some time Remploy could go it alone without government money!

B-UK then decided to state the obvious, with: "Thirdly, of course, the current economic climate is dire with ever more austerity on the horizon, the decimation of welfare support for disabled people, and rising unemployment for the whole population. This third factor is often used - misguidedly, we believe - to justify the current calls to keep Remploy factories open."

As a trade unionist, misguided if we follow your line, I believe there is a very good reason to keep Remploy factories open. Because, they maintain a few thousand disabled people in meaningful employment. B-UK, your way points to despair and poverty for the overwhelming majority of Remploy workers should they become unemployed. There is a perversity, almost of a masochistic nature, in your reasoning around the existence of Remploy.

If Remploy was a co-operative or social enterprise ran by disabled workers for disabled workers you would doubtlessly bestow upon it a mark of approval. Would you then criticise it for segregating its workforce; or decry the fact that it was still publicly funded because now local authorities and councils were handing out subsidies and grants and contracts - where do you get your funding?

Your idea of handing factories over to User Led Organisations is not new. When the York factory closed several years ago throwing 54 people out of work; from its ashes rose a co-operative phoenix. This enterprise is still operating. It employs 3 people making garden furniture and two others to run the co-op (a buyer and manager I imagine). Sadly, the co-op is struggling; and I understand being helped by trade union donations.

Is this the model you think the rest of the Remploy factories should consider? There is nothing wrong with the concept of co-ops and social enterprises (except that SE's usually lead to privatisation, downsizing and a general race to the bottom for their employees). However, if you hadn't noticed we are in the middle of a double-dip recession; one that, if we look at what's happening in mainland Europe (which is like a 'get-out-of-jail-free-card' for this government) could make things even worse here.

Double-dip recessions, an increase in unemployment and the slashing of local authority and council budgets to the bone are hardly conditions conducive to starting up scores of co-ops and SE's in individual regions or several hundred nationally. Even if such enterprises were opened, they would still need the life blood of any business venture, orders in their books. Giving groups of people £10,000 to start up on their own account may sound generous; but, in reality it is like putting a band-aid on a gaping wound.

B-UK goes on to reveal: "This barriers approach, or the social model, identifies the real problems – barriers and discrimination - and points the way to real solutions."

At last we arrive at the crux of the matter. Remploy factories only exist because of societal barriers and discrimination against disabled people; and the social model of disability will save the day. Except of course, in the real world the 'social model', a social policy I wholeheartedly embrace, is always trumped by its bigger bullying brother the 'economic model' .

Finally B-UK, I see by your statistics that you supported 43 people into paid employment last year. Well done. From my experiences I am willing to bet the people you helped into employment were well educated and relatively young. In order for the nearly 2,000 unemployed Remploy workers to be re-employed it would take 46 B-UKs, as well as a mountain of employer prejudice to shift.  

If the government figures of 1.2 million unemployed disabled people wishing to work are true, then I ask you Breakthrough-UK how exactly you think adding another two-thousand people to the queue will do anything but add misery and heartache to another 2,000 people, their families and friends. Not to forget the economic impact of another 2,000 wage packets no longer contributing to the Treasury and local economies. Do you think that the social model of disability will somehow bring down this regime that purports to govern us. Do you suppose Iain Duncan-Smith is going to sometime soon have an epiphany that causes him to embrace the social model. At what point in our troubled history do you think employers will banish disability discrimination from their recruitment processes and open the door to us...

In the struggle

Seán McGovern

Unite the Union Disability Executive Rep

Remploy Vs Access to Work

On the Remploy page on Facebook someone stated that Access to work no longer funds adaptations to workplaces. Let us not get mired down in propaganda, that is the way of this government and its attack-dog press. Therefore, stating that there is no government spending on Access to Work; or that A2W no longer assist in workplace adaptations is not the case, this only applies to adaptations to new premises.

A2W and Remploy
need not compete

As a disabled person in work I receive A2W for a support worker (for which A2W picks up the whole tab); when I began the job, around 6-months ago, I applied for a bespoke chair, which I now use (and for which A2W met 90% of the cost and my employer 10%); and I'm in the process of applying for a wheelchair hoist for my car.

Let's be clear about A2W. It is an excellent scheme that is in dire need of greater funding. Common sense, and prudence, should dictate that the government pump scores of millions into this scheme, as for every £1 invested they see a return of £1.41 through tax and NI contributions!

However, here lies the rub. Sayce in her review of disability employment support praises Access to Work as the way forward; while consigning Remploy factories and residential training courses (RTC) to the dustbin of history. Using Sayce's figures, the combined government funding for both Remploy and RTC's adds up to over £80 million. Yet, the government has only announced an extra £15 million over three years to A2W.

Disabled Remploy worker carrying out skilled work

Investing in A2W could be carried out while keeping Remploy factories open. The two do not have to compete. Remploy factory subsidies are falling. Given the correct market impetus (the full exploitation of reserved contracts for supported factories and businesses); and a complete root and branch restructuring of Remploy's senior management corps and board of directors, could still allow Remploy to reduce its state subsidy. But, such major changes need time to show results.  

So, as this government strips non-waged disabled people of their benefits, telling them that work is the solution to their being lifted from poverty it shows just how committed it is by offering a measly £5 million extra per year - a paltry 6.25% that it will save by shutting down Remploy factories and closing RTC schemes. Hardly the actions of a government seriously looking to help anyone out of poverty.

Iran continues to slaughter young gay men

The caption below, from a few days ago in Iran, shows four young men hanging from the jib of a crane. These men were executed by the Iranian State, the crime...they were homosexuals. Please Iran stop killing young men on the grounds of sexual preference. This is not the way for any civilised country to treat people.

Four lights snubbed out on this chandelier of death.

Using Seance's for Disability History Month

Bumped into Kevin Caufield, from ALLFIE, in the lift at work yesterday lunchtime.

We did the usual lift thing exchanging hellos and smiles. However, the Lambeth Accord lift is notoriously slow, so we found ourselves in that state of suspended time where pregnant pauses stretch out to infinity.

“Busy Kevin?” I mused – always prepared for such occasions with an incisive silence breaker.

“Yes, very” came back Kevin, “I’m carrying out an oral history of disabled people in education over the past 100 years. However, the hundred year-old ones are the problem” quipped Kevin.

My parting advice to Kevin was, “Keep at it. You’re bound to dig something up”.

Careful how you go about your research, Kevin!

All right, I'm leaving!

Ian Duncan-Smith Insults Hard-Working Disabled People

The Sunday Express was present a few days ago when Ian Duncan-Smith baited disabled workers present with:

“Is it a kindness to stick people in some factory where they are not doing any work at all? Just making cups of coffee?"

http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/318425

Ian Duncan-Smith making unfounded statements about disabled workers to Remploy Representatives

Some years ago I worked in a Remploy factory and can therefore vouch for the productivity and industriousness of these workers. Workers in Remploy, when given proper investment of opportunity, in work, and in training proved more than competent to carry out the tasks as well as being inventive enough not to let their disabilities beat them.

“I promise you this is better. Taking this decision was a balance between how much do I want to spend keeping a number of people in Remploy factories not producing stuff versus getting people into proper jobs.”

By 'better' I assume Duncan-Smith means putting real people out of, despite his propaganda, real jobs versus placing disabled workers into 'mainstream' employment. IDS is of course being disingenuous when he speaks of 'getting people into real jobs'. There are so few jobs, real or otherwise, out there; and those few that do exist are fought for tooth and nail giving employers the opportunity to cherry pick - if employers could circumvent the law to avoid employing disabled people in good times; they're certainly not going to become decent people now and begin employing us.

Stunned, Julie, 55, said: “We work in our factories!”

And work they do. Not only do Remploy factories make top grade furniture that graces our schools and the offices of businesses around the country. They are a vital part of the motor vehicle components sector. Remploy workers also produce helmet visors and anti-chemical/bacteria clothing for the armed services.

The factories are run on the same lines as any other commercial enterprise, in that staff clock in and out of work. They can be disciplined in exactly any the same way a worker would be in the private sector; and there are grievance procedures in place exactly as you would find in 'mainstream' employment.

The minister barked back: “You don’t produce very much at all.”

Interesting remark from someone from a party in government who during 19 years in control of this country through the 1980s and most of the 1990s produced what exactly? We do know what they destroyed:

·       Manufacturing

·       The coal industry

·       Shipbuilding

·       The steel industry

·       Whole communities in what was our industrial heartland

·       Our railway system

·       The link for retired people between and wage increases/RPI

·       The countries utilities - all in the blessed cause of choice!

·       Council housing stock

·       And last, but not least they tried to consign society to the dustbin

An even more remarkable comment from a government who thus far in two years is destroying our Welfare State and NHS, while blithely dragging us into a double-dip recession by employing austerity remedies that are failing in Ireland; using cures that see unemployment amongst young people in Spain at over 50%; and adopting the same kind of economic solutions that has Greece teetering on the edge of anarchy.

Ian Duncan-Smith, I put it to you that you don't produce very much at all!

Another Inaccessible Pub in Lambeth

My workmates visited the Crown and Anchor in Brixton Road last week. They quite enjoyed it; found the drinks ok; and the ambience enjoyable.

Sadly, this is yet another pub in the area that I can't use due to lack of accessibility. According to my friends, there is an imposing front step and the loos are all downstairs; which is kind of fucking awkward for me, as a wheelchair user.

What a shame; well for me it is.

It wouldn't be so bad if the place was a pokey little pub; but passing the Crown and Anchor to and from work every day, I can't help to notice that it is quite long. Long enough to have accommodated a two-metre square partitioned-off Kharzy.

The photo below gives some idea of the size of the pub's interior.

The interior of the recently refurbished Crown and Anchor in Brixton Road

Sure, an accessible toilet would have displaced a couple of tables; maybe even attracted the wrong kind of boozers - you know, wheelchair users, associated cripples and Radar key users...

Hmm, on reflection, I can actually sympathise with the publican and his clientele; once you let one in, your guard drops, then you're fucked. You end up with an alehouse that attracts a more rounded cross-section of the area.

Remploy Workers Protest Outside Parliament

A couple of hundred Remploy workers and supporters marched from Caxton Hall in Westminster to a rally in Old Palace Yard opposite the Houses of Parliament. Remploy workers including Julie Haynes and Ray Ludford spoke passionately on the importance of retaining Remploy factories and the issue of choice for disabled Workers.

Gail Cartmail, a Unite Assistant General Secretary, pledged the union's full support in the fight to keep the factories open. Gail stated: “Our members feel outrage that the government could take jobs from disabled people in this current climate. How are they expected to find work when there are 2.65 million people in the queue in front of them?"

Seán McGovern speaking to rally on 20th April 2012

Finally, Seán McGovern, Disability Delegate to the Unite Executive Council, Remploy Branch Secretary and ex-Remploy worker, spoke. Seán reminded the rally that a 24-hour vigil held but a few yards along the road stopped a planned closure of Remploy factories back in February 2000; and that we must use all the resources we had to ensure we stop today's proposed closures.

Save Remploy Public Meeting - 26 April 2012

Dear Comrade

Remploy is proposing to close 36 of its factories before the summer is over. These closures will include all three remaining sites in London. Since the last round of closures, 4-years ago, some 80-85% of those made redundant are still out of work.

The hundreds of Disabled Remploy factory workers who find themselves jobless come August, if the closures go ahead, will find it even more difficult to find work than it was in 2008. Most fear long periods of unemployment.

We must do our best to help our Remploy Comrades to keep their plants open.

On Thursday 26^th March at 6.30 pm the Remploy Unions in London are holding a 'Save Remploy' public meeting. This will be a meeting with a slight difference in that the top table will be filled with Remploy workers present and past. They will tell you, the audience, their stories. How working in Remploy gives them self-esteem and a sense of being part of a greater work community.

Comrade, please come along to Faraday House, 48-51 Old Gloucester Street, Holborn, London, WC1N 3AE - it's opposite Unite the Union's office car park.

In the struggle

Seán McGovern

Secretary of Unite's L&E 1971 Remploy Branch

Remploy Co-Ops?

A reader in today's on-line Guardian asks:

"Why not let some of the facotry workers rent or buy the empty factories and run them themselves sort of like a co-operative? That way they get rid of their factories but the workers can keep their jobs."

Sayce does actually suggest both co-ops and social enterprises as possible solutions once Remploy factories lose their government subsidies. Indeed, the Remploy York factory, before its closure around 4-years ago produced chemical warfare clothing for the MOD, employed over 50 disabled people.

Following the closure some determined trade unionists got together and formed the York Disabled Workers' Co-Operative in 2010. The co-op produces quality garden furniture. However, unlike its predecessor, the Remploy factory which had a workforce of 54, the co-op only employs five people.

Phil Davies with the deed signed at the GMB union office

establishing the legality of York Disabled Workers Co-operative Ltd

We should salute the co-op; and wish it well. However, such ventures while they show both enterprise and initiative will not afford the overwhelming majority of Remploy workers who are facing redundancy a life-line. In fact even if there was the know-how, readiness and entrepreneurial drive amongst the 1700 workers affected by these closures, are local economies robust enough at the moment to sustain another 300-400 new co-ops or social enterprises?

The UK's economy is floating in the doldrums; quarter by quarter only narrowly escaping being officially declared back in recession. Our banking system has hardly covered itself in glory since we bailed them out, thus creating the mess we now find ourselves in. Unless banks are willing to  lend to ventures such as co-ops and social enterprises, chances of success are slim.

Even if our banks had the decency to realise it's our, the public's, money that they have stuffed in their vaults, would they take the risk of funding disabled peoples' enterprises especially since the government shows no confidence in disabled workers when it pulls their subsidy.    

SAVE REMPLOY - PUBLIC MEETING

SAVE REMPLOY -  PUBLIC MEETING

THURSDAY 26^TH APRIL 6.30 - 8.30 PM

AT

FARADAY HOUSE

48-51 Old Gloucester Street

London, WC1N 3AE

(Opposite Unite's Holborn Office car park)

As a result of the damning Sayce Report on funding for disabled workers last year Remploy has announced the closure of 36 of its 54 factories. The first closures are imminent; and the remaining 18 will be forced to shut by the end of 2013 if they cannot reduce the subsidy for per disabled factory worker.

THERE WILL NOT BE ANY 'BIG' NAMES ON THE TOP TABLE

THIS MEETING IS LED BY REMPLOY WORKERS PRESENT AND PAST

WE'VE LISTENED TO WHAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS TO SAY ON THE CLOSURES...

NOW COME AND HEAR WHAT THE REMPLOY WORKERS HAVE TO SAY!

Join us in the fight to save Remploy

Be Careful Where You Store Petrol

Andrew Neil on Facebook today: "Heavy rain so thought it prudent to fill up bath to fend off supposed drought. But bath still brimming with petrol for supposed strike."

Then Andrew, no better time to lie back in your bath for a long leisurely soak. Oh, and why not treat yourself to that Habana cigar you've been saving for a rainy day?

I had my suspicions about Francis Maud's advice on petrol storage!

Labour Must Distance Themselves from Neo-Liberal Policies

Another of the great myths was that bankers and financiers were awarded fantastically high salaries and massive amounts in bonuses because they were risk takers.

Well of course that myth was well and truly dispelled when in 2008 we watched as bank after bank came cap-in-hand to governments around the world begging to be bailed-out.

This socialisation of debt while keeping profit private should have brought a greater balance to the obscene rewards those at the top of the finance sector were giving themselves. Sadly, and I blame the Left politically for missing their opportunity to deliver the coup de grace against neo-liberal capitalism, we allowed these vultures to carry on almost as if nothing wrong. Now we're beset by their friends in Parliament; and of course they're picking away at the rest of the corpse created by their friends in high finance.

It would be, at least, a partial victory if Labour could realise that the only way out of this economic quagmire created by casino bankers and tax cheats is to move away from the failed policies of the neo-libs.

Hopefully, this realisation will come sooner rather than later to allow Labour to set out a stall which doesn't sell the same worn-out ideas of the Tories in slightly more acceptable packaging.  

Gripes and Sour Grapes Over a Football Game

On Chelsea's spectacular win over Tottenham today, Jason on Facebook thinks that "they dont deserve to go through tonight in my eyes just for the dispicable actions tonight let alone the totally unfair game tonight!! well pisses me off that chelsea was fowling tottenham all over the place and the ref did nothing"

Chelsea footballers holding a silence for the dead of Hillsborough
at today's FA Cup semi-final against Tottenham at Wembley

Those Chelsea fans that ignored the request for a few moments silence are despicable. Sadly, such things happen among groups within a fan base; and there is little the club can do. I'm sure if the club could identify the idiots who ignored the call for silence they would deal with them harshly.

As for Chelsea not deserving to win; come on, the score speaks for itself. Spurs received three yellow cards to Chelsea's two; both sides recorded eight fouls apiece. I watched the game, and it wasn't a particularly dirty match. Bellyaching about the ref letting fouls go by for one side over the other is the age old sour grapes of the loser.

In the end, whether the second Chelsea goal was a goal or not, Chelsea won by a large margin. Doubtlessly Tottenham have had dubious decisions go their way in the past; and I'm sure in the future they'll earn a goal or a penalty via a dodgy ref's decision; but hey, that's part of the flow and go of the game. I seem to recall England being given a similar decision some years ago; after which they went on to win the game and the World Cup, do you regard them as unworthy winners too, Jason?

"Charity is a cold grey loveless thing"

The recent charity tax law once again holds these practices up to the naked light of public opinion. Richard Murphy, the excellent author of the Tax Research UK Blog appositely quotes Clement Atlee's “Charity is a cold grey loveless thing. If a rich man wants to help the poor, he should pay his taxes gladly, not dole out money at a whim.”

Clem Atlee Post War PM who Brought in the Welfare State and NHS
at a Time when the UK Was in Far Greater Debt Than Today

My sentiments entirely. I recently applied to Motability (a charitable organisation) for financial assistance with a wheelchair hoist for my car (my new chair is heavier than the previous and my PAs are having problems lifting and storing it in the back of the car).

A couple of weeks later I received a telephone call informing me that my application was not successful. When I queried this outcome I was told there was nothing I could do, the decision is final.

I could understand it if I was earning a massive salary (I’m a part-time worker on tax credits); or if I’d bundles of savings (I’ve a couple of thousand saved).

Once again the actions of a charity proving that without full and open accountability these organisations pick and chose worthy recipients of their largesse. Unlike government benefits and schemes that have a properly set down criteria for entitlement and appeals procedures, Motability does not.


http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/ 

Steve Collins: A Remploy Worker's Testimony to Closures

Whilst making a YouTube video of an interview  with the Sunday Express; an interview that centred on the closures of Remploy factories, Steve Collins did what I've witnessed other Remploy workers and their families do over the years. He shed tears. These tears are a reflection of the very real fears he expresses when talking about his future employment opportunities if Remploy folds. 

Some months before the first round of Remploy closures, almost 5-years ago, I witnessed one of the most moving testimonies of just how frightening and stark it is for a disabled person to be told that their factory is closing; and they'd be without of a job.

A severely disabled worker from the, then, Brixton factory stood up, with great effort and dignity, at a meeting in one of the House of Commons committee rooms and shared with the congregation of Remploy workers, union officials and MPs her story.

Shelia (not her real name) told us that she felt more a part of society by going into work and contributing her share. For years she was unemployed, and in those years felt as though she wasn't participating fully to the community in which she lived.

She went on to express the sense of comradeship and family the workplace offered. Work, she said, also gave her independence, affording her social integration. Work not only gave shape and routine to Sheila's life, it also gave her a decent standard of life; whereas, living on benefits would in effect make her a prisoner in her flat, where she lived alone.

She finished by looking at the MPs and saying that if she lost her job at Remploy it would create a big hole in her life. Sheila knew, as most of the other Remploy workers in those grand settings of Westminster, that when the doors of their factories closed they would never again have that feeling of worth that working gives so many; that they would remain unemployed; and slide further and deeper into poverty.

To this day I still believe this was the most passionate and heartfelt speech I've ever heard (and I'm a veteran of dozens of conferences). A speech that not only reached out to people's hearts, but one which, if stripped back, appealed to their sense of what was just plain right. There was not a dry eye in that room on that day, including myself.

Finally, the fact that traditionally the Express and sister paper the Sunday Express have espoused right, and sometimes, far right attitudes politically and socially really brings home just how far the nasty party has lurched to the right.

Thank you Steve Collins for saying what thousands of Remploy workers, past and present, feel. You displayed more dignity in the short YouTube video that Cameron or his ilk could summon up in a lifetime. I, along people like Steve, my Remploy Branch, and other trade union and disability activists will do our best to make sure the factories remain open and jobs secured.

What Happened to Voltaire?

On Facebook, Andrew Neil Asserts: "The idea gay people can be, even need to be, "cured" repulsive. But why ban ads saying so? What happened to Voltaire?"

My response is: ‎"What happened to Voltaire?" he died. 

Whatever happened to with free speech comes responsibility? It comes down to the crying fire in a crowded theatre argument. Hate crime abounds; why give the fools who perpetrate such crimes further licence?

The Last Of The Billingsgate Fish Porters

The Last Of The Billingsgate Fish Porters

A way of life

Scratching a living

Snatched away

By unforgiving

Profit-hungry

Faceless men,

Who, with

The swipe of a pen

Consign humanity

Into profit

And loss

As though

Just useless

Human dross.

Vulcans and Turkeys

”Even Tory ex-minister John Redwood now says the tax debate is “crowding out the more important matters of what Ken or Boris would do to the Council Tax, the policing, and the transport of London,”…

Yes, but isn’t that a bit like a turkey, in early December, stating that the chestnut stuffing, cranberry sauce and sprouts debate is “crowding out more important Christmas matters such as the Nativity, carol singing and peace and goodwill to all men”?

Turkey going about his business discussing the Nativity,
carol singing and peace and goodwill to all men

If only ANYONE but this arsewipe had made the observation...

Redwood creating Vulcan tax loops

Poverty's When...

Poverty's When...

Poverty's when the soul's unfed

Poverty's when love's left for dead

Poverty's when our dreams are drowned

Poverty's when no hope can be found

Poverty's when the rich grow fatter

Poverty's when the poor don't matter. 

SAVE REMPLOY

SAVE REMPLOY

DEMO, MARCH & RALLY

Date: Friday 20th April 2012

Time: Assemble Midday

Place: Outside the Department of Work and

Pensions, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9NA

March to Old Palace Yard, Westminster,

London, SW1P 3JY for rally with speakers

On 7th March Remploy announced its intention to close all of its factories with the potential compulsory redundancy of 1,752 mostly disabled workers. The joint Unions are committed to fighting to save the Remploy factories and our members’ jobs. We must show the strength of feeling that taking jobs from disabled people should not be tolerated in a civilised society. It will not improve the country’s financial situation – it may well make it worse.

Join us in the fight to save Remploy

www.unitetheunion.org

Doesn't it Make You Feel Safe in God?

Vegetarians, those low-down-non-red-meat-eating-non-animal-slaughtering-sandal-knitting-pinko-panty-waist-commie-loving-heathens! I feel a reeeeevivalist meeting coming on! The Lord is calling on me to launder my best bed linen (plenty of starch to get the pointy-hat a-standing upright). Yeeehaw, we're gonna have us some cross burning! LOL

The Windmill Inn

I attended St Gerard's School, Clapham Common South Side, from 1968-73. As I recall some of my most productive hours back then were spent in the public bar of the Windmill Inn. Ah, far happier less complicated times.

The Windmill stood on Clapham Common, set back slightly from the main road, directly opposite the front of our school; and on hot summer's days many is the time my attention was drawn from 'Harry' Horn's waffle about the importance of chess and Dickens; or Jim Smith's over-enthusiastic take on some battle or other in this country's distance bloody past, and through the classroom windows across the A3 past a clump of trees to the frontage of the pub. So tantalisingly near; yet so unattainably distant.

The Windmill Inn Clapham Common

Towards the end of the Fifth Year a few of us in the class, having already abandoned our school uniforms, used to pop into the bar at lunchtimes. Most of us were pub users anyway, had been for a while.

Funny really, just how quick we made that transition from snotty nosed school boys to young urbane men of the world. Not so very long before the pub had served another purpose for. When fractiousness exploded amongst us boys, the chilling words would be intoned: “Right, behind the Windmill after school, you’re dead”. 

Oh, the expectations of those words. Two young Achilles’ pitting their martial prowess in hand to hand fighting? No. More like two scared lads. By the end of the school day they were wondering whether a note from their mums might excuse them from the imminent ritual. No chance. The attendant baying mob had paid to see blood; and blood they’d get.

Pushed together the crestfallen warriors would trade a few unimpressive slaps. One would then escalate events by putting the other in a neck-lock. Within seconds they’d be rolling around on the ground. This was the cue for crowd participation and they started to kick the remaining dignity from the fallen heroes. 

Nothing About Us Without Us!

Christ, am I pissed off! A little while back this evening I received a call from a friend; and we fell into discussing things that I'd let slip due to a recent illness. On 19^th March I was invited to a meeting, which due to a prior engagement I was unable to attend, held by a number of Left Movement groups to discuss the situation at Remploy. These groups included DPAC and Right to Work.

From Tuesday until yesterday, Sunday, I was ill; so had no opportunity to talk to people, although from time to time I did check my emails. There were a few things coming up which I made a note of, especially the stuff occurring in the evenings, as they'd not interfere with work.

So, a little way into our chat my friend tells me that a meeting to discuss the Remploy factory closures had been agreed and would take place on 20^th April at ULU. Agreed by whom? I asked, curious since I am the Secretary of Unite's L&E 1971 Remploy Branch, the largest existing Branch in London. My friend couldn't answer exactly. Was it RL or LW, I queried.

He did tell me that John McDonnell and Mark Sirwotka were to be present; but was not sure who exactly the organisers were.

As a Branch Secretary of long standing, 15-years, I've been involved in hundreds of meetings, actions, demos, pickets and rallies involving Remploy. Back in February 2000 I took part in a 24-hour vigil outside Parliament, at which I nearly froze to death while escaping arrest by inches.

In 2006 we marched on the mighty Emirates Stadium in defence of the Holloway factory; and we got decent football loving Gooners behind our cause. The company capitulated and gave us a new factory a couple of miles away in Green Lanes near to Finsbury Park.

Through 2007 and into 2008 along with other disabled Remploy Comrades I criss-crossed the UK attending demos, rallies and picket lines in Wales, Scotland and England. Despite the tears and looks of despair on the faces of those losing their jobs, we fought on; because we knew our cause was right.

Sadly, and along ideological lines, a Labour government betrayed thousands of disabled workers and cruelly closed their factories. It is hard to fully capture in words the sense of hopelessness I saw on the faces of decent workers who knew once they clocked out that last time in London, Liverpool, Glasgow, Cardiff, or any of the other twenty-odd sites around the country; that this would be their last experience of waged employment.

Standing in front of forty-some people at the Brixton site was one of the hardest things I've ever experienced. The stewards in the factory had asked me to come to a meeting as they were getting a lot of grief from the membership, and non-members too. My role was to listen to the members, and to defend the stewards.

Alas, the meeting was acrimonious. People were, very naturally, upset that they would soon be unemployed. They were, as to be expected, concerned for their futures.

So, for a little while I allowed people to vent their anger, and fears. We were in a lose lose situation; and I was certainly not going to inflame the situation with insensitivities.

However, after the first flush of pass the blame, one of our members shouted "Where were the unions. What did you do to stop the closure?" At this point I became a wee bit pissed off. The man who posed the question was well known for stirring things up in the workplace; yet conspicuous by his absence at every single event we had arranged; whether marching on the Emirates; visiting Parliament; or even coming out on a Saturday morning to do some leafleting in Brixton High Street.

"Where were you 'X'?" I replied. "You're part of the union. So are you; and you are too; and you as well" I pointed out to some of the others who had been invisible during the campaign - incidentally, these were people who had fairly good physical and mental capacity.

Then I started to name people who had poured their hearts and souls into the campaign. These were the people who should be thanked I explained. Instead, you pour blame upon them. At this point people began to applaud; and I noticed members clapping the stewards and chief activists on the back; while others sheepishly extended a hand for shaking.

We all from time to time need to let off steam. Sometimes it's a bit too scalding; that's when the coolness of a friendly and understanding touch on the shoulder or shake of the hand is worth a million smiles. People walked away from that meeting on that day, still sad; but with a feeling of a happiness carried out.

Our Branch has been active for over 16-years and during that time we've contributed in both money and solidarity to hundreds of causes from making a small contribution to the fire-fighters who laid down their lives the day the Twin Towers collapsed to requests for support and solidarity to industrial actions up and down the land, and beyond. And, if we last another 16 we'll carry on the tradition.

Members of the L&E 1971 Remploy Branch are appreciative of any help and support given to them by sister organisations within the Movement. This extends to DPAC and Right to Work who recently invited us to a meeting to discuss ways to counter the Remploy factory closures, three of which are in London. Thank you.

Most of you on the left will be familiar with the old disability saying "Nothing about us without us". This is how the 1971 Branch feels at the moment. Events and meetings are being arranged with no notification to either the Chair or Secretary of the Branch - I learned of a 'Fight Remploy Closures Meeting' from a Comrade this evening. When pressed for some answers to questions, I thought were quite reasonable given the circumstances, he could not tell me who had booked the meeting; who had sent out invitations to speakers; or indeed whether anyone from Remploy had a coordinating role in the event.

With a bit of digging I found the meeting on Google - just a date (which happened to be wrong!) and a venue were sufficient clues to tracking down the info. Looks like a good gig. John McDonnell, Lez Woodward, Gail Cartmail amongst the speakers; but nobody from Remploy in London - as though we don't count. More digging found that DPAC was also holding an event in Remploy's name on 18^th April. On top of all this the Trade Unions have organised a march and rally from the DWP in Tothill Street to Old Palace Yard in Westminster at noon on Friday 20^th April.

Have since spoken to people involved in the meeting. Maybe this will have a reasonable outcome.