Oh come on, guns
don't murder people; people murder people. However, the easy acquisition of
guns in the US is the major cause of so much gun crime, and especially death.
James Homes, the
alleged gunman, is a highly intelligent young man. A young man with excellent
qualifications, a BSc in Neuroscience. According to colleagues he is a
personable man, if "...a bit
socially awkward...not to a dgree that would warrant suspicion of mass murder
or any atrocity of this nature."
Sadly, the recent
killing of 12 people and injuring of a further 60 by a lone gunman, apparently,
using automatic weapons legally bought and held is a recurring theme in the
land of the free. Time after time presidents have appeared on TV screens after
such incidents - there are an average 20 mass shootings every year in the
States.
However, in recent
times this figure seems to have exploded. Apparently, there have been some 60
mass shootings in the USA since the 2011 massacre in Arizona where 19 people,
including the gunman, died in a supermarket car park.
The Second Amendment
of the United States Constitution may well state that "A well regulated militia, being necessary
to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms
shall not be infringed."
However, laws are not written in stone; nor are laws passed in order to remain
unchallenged in perpetuity.
With the passage of time comes change; and the 'well
regulated militia' of some 220+ years needed to be ready to suppress and defend
the State against tyrant European Princes is no longer needed.
It is not needed, nor has it been, for a long time. The USA
has a national structure of armed forces as well as diverse law enforcement
agencies. The idea that a European power, or any other power coming to that,
will begin imposing unfair taxes and laws upon a modern US is not feasible. The
very reason for the existence of the Second Amendmet, and for the right of ordinary
citizens to bear arms is an anachronistic freedom; it is a indefensible freedom
claimed by those of a conservative leaning, particularly those on the political
right.
While amending the Second Amendment in order to put greater
regulation on gun ownership would not necessarily stop people killing one and
other; nor would it entirely stop people murdering others with guns. What it
would probably achieve is to put an end to these senseless mall, cinema and
high school massacres that occur with too great a regularity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tags