According to Tory MP, Richard Graham, the rationale behind the DWP’s persistent
and cruel re-assessment programme of disabled people, even those with life-time
conditions, claiming PIP and ESA is: "Some permanent degenerative
conditions do degenerate, some stabilise and some do get better - it's a mixed
situation."
Let’s break down the logic of this MP, a man without any medical
qualifications.
1. Permanent
degenerative conditions by their nature do degenerate. The clue lies in the
term ‘permanent degenerative’.
2. Yes, some (permanent
degenerative conditions) can be, for periods of time, kept stable. However,
that stability can usually be accounted for by factors such as, having enough
money to counter the difficulties met through disability; or having decent care
and support packages in place.
3. However,
permanent degenerative conditions do not get better, barring miracles.
When Victoria Derbyshire interrupted the Tory disability benefits’
slasher by asking him, reasonably: “Which permanent degenerative condition gets
better?” The Old Etonian responded, “Victoria I’m not going to try and get into
an argument about specific conditions here…”
Of course, you’re not you degenerate Tory vampire. Why should you be
expected to base your ideological blathering on such tedious things as facts? Why
should you base your decisions, decisions often a matter of life and death to disabled
people, on anything approximating solid evidence?
Please, don’t allow Richard Graham MP and the rest of the Tory scum to
impose another five-years of abject misery on disabled people in the UK. Vote
him and his ilk out of office.
If you only cast one vote this year, make sure it’s on June 8th;
and make sure it’s for a Labour candidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Tags